|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
21/12/2023 |
Actualizado : |
21/12/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Autor : |
VICENTE, E.; RODRÍGUEZ, G.; GHELFI, B.; LADO, J.; ARRUABARRENA, A.; ARIAS, M.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; ZUNINI, N. |
Afiliación : |
CARLOS ESTEBAN VICENTE CASTRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO ROBERTO RODRÍGUEZ LAGOUTTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSE BRIAN GHELFI DE SOUZA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOANNA LADO LINDNER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANA ARRUABARRENA PASCOVICH, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIANA ARIAS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MATIAS GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; NICOLAS DANIEL ZUNINI DEL VALLE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
¿Cómo se obtienen las variedades de boniato?- |
Complemento del título : |
Hortifruticultura. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista INIA Uruguay, Diciembre 2023, no.75 p.68-70. |
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 75). |
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
Las variedades de boniato más utilizadas en Uruguay fueron generadas por el mejoramiento genético nacional. Las actividades de investigación
se iniciaron en 1973 colectando poblaciones locales e introduciendo variedades extranjeras. |
Palabras claves : |
SISTEMA VEGETAL INTENSIVO - INIA. |
Thesagro : |
BONIATO; IPOMOEA BATATAS; VARIEDADES. |
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/17459/1/Revista-INIA-75-dic-2023-16.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00978naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1064421 005 2023-12-21 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-9011 100 1 $aVICENTE, E. 245 $a¿Cómo se obtienen las variedades de boniato?-$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 490 $a(Revista INIA; 75). 520 $aLas variedades de boniato más utilizadas en Uruguay fueron generadas por el mejoramiento genético nacional. Las actividades de investigación se iniciaron en 1973 colectando poblaciones locales e introduciendo variedades extranjeras. 650 $aBONIATO 650 $aIPOMOEA BATATAS 650 $aVARIEDADES 653 $aSISTEMA VEGETAL INTENSIVO - INIA 700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ, G. 700 1 $aGHELFI, B. 700 1 $aLADO, J. 700 1 $aARRUABARRENA, A. 700 1 $aARIAS, M. 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M. 700 1 $aZUNINI, N. 773 $tRevista INIA Uruguay, Diciembre 2023, no.75 p.68-70.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
14/06/2019 |
Actualizado : |
04/11/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
OLIVERA-MUZANTE, J.; FIERRO, S.; ALABART, J.L.; CLARAMUNT, M.; MINTEGUIAGA, M.A.; AUNCHAYNA, G.; ERRANDONEA, N.; BANCHERO, G. |
Afiliación : |
Laboratorio de Reproducción Animal “Dr. Alfredo Ferraris”, Departamento de Ovinos, Lanas y Caprinos, Facultad de Veterinaria, EEMAC, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú, 60000, Uruguay.; Secretariado Uruguayo de la Lana (S.U.L.), Área de Transferencia de Tecnología, Servando Gómez 2408, Montevideo, 12100, Uruguay.; Unidad de Producción y Sanidad Animal, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain / dInstituto Agroalimentario de Aragón – IA2 (CITA-Universidad), Spain.; Grupo multidisciplinario de ecología para la agricultura, Centro Universitario Regional Este, Universidad de la República, Ruta 8 km 292, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay.; Laboratorio de Reproducción Animal “Dr. Alfredo Ferraris”, Departamento de Salud en los Sistemas Pecuarios, Facultad de Veterinaria, EEMAC, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú, 60000, Uruguay.; Veterinary Doctor, Liberal Exercise of Profession, Mercedes, Soriano, Uruguay.; Veterinary Doctor, Liberal Exercise of Profession, Tomás Gomensoro, Artigas, Uruguay.; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Short-term dietary protein supplementation improves reproductive performance of estrous-synchronized ewes when there are long intervals of prostaglandin or progesterone-based treatments for timed AI. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Reproduction Science, July 2019, Volume 206, Pages 78-84. |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.05.011 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 21 November 2018 //Received in revised form 9 May 2019// Accepted23May2019//Available online 25 May 2019. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:To evaluate the reproductive effects of a short-term dietary protein supplementation (Days -10 to -3) before timed AI (TAI = Day 0), 471 Merino ewes grazing native pastures were estrous-synchronized when there were either long intervals between prostaglandin administrations (two prostaglandin injections 15 or 16 d apart; PG15 and PG16, respectively) or with a progesterone-eCG (P4-eCG) protocol, resulting in a 3 × 2 experimental design. Ovulation rate on Day 8 (OR), non-estrous-return to Day 21 (NRR21), and fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 70 were evaluated. The interaction between estrous synchronization protocol and supplementation was not significant for any of these variables (P > 0.05). Supplementation increased OR, prolificacy and fecundity (+0.14, +0.15 and +0.14, respectively, P < 0.01), but did not affect NRR21 or fertility of ewes (+6.2% and +6.7% respectively, P > 0.05). Ewes treated using the PG15 and PG16 protocols had a lesser OR (-0.27), prolificacy (?0.22) and fecundity (?0.20) than ewes treated using P4-eCG protocol (P < 0.01 for each), and similar NRR21 and fertility (?5.4% and ?7.9% respectively, P > 0.05 for both variables), without significant differences between the PG15 and PG16 groups. In conclusion, a short-term dietary protein supplementationbefore TAI improved OR, prolificacy and fecundity of ewes which were estrous-synchronized by imposing long interval PG (15 or 16 d apart) or P4-eCG-based protocols. There was a greater OR, prolificacy and fecundity when there was use of the P4-eCG compared to longinterval PG-based protocols. Estrous-non-return rate after AI and fertility as a result TAI were not affected by either the supplementation or the estrous synchronization protocols used. MenosAbstract:To evaluate the reproductive effects of a short-term dietary protein supplementation (Days -10 to -3) before timed AI (TAI = Day 0), 471 Merino ewes grazing native pastures were estrous-synchronized when there were either long intervals between prostaglandin administrations (two prostaglandin injections 15 or 16 d apart; PG15 and PG16, respectively) or with a progesterone-eCG (P4-eCG) protocol, resulting in a 3 × 2 experimental design. Ovulation rate on Day 8 (OR), non-estrous-return to Day 21 (NRR21), and fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 70 were evaluated. The interaction between estrous synchronization protocol and supplementation was not significant for any of these variables (P > 0.05). Supplementation increased OR, prolificacy and fecundity (+0.14, +0.15 and +0.14, respectively, P < 0.01), but did not affect NRR21 or fertility of ewes (+6.2% and +6.7% respectively, P > 0.05). Ewes treated using the PG15 and PG16 protocols had a lesser OR (-0.27), prolificacy (?0.22) and fecundity (?0.20) than ewes treated using P4-eCG protocol (P < 0.01 for each), and similar NRR21 and fertility (?5.4% and ?7.9% respectively, P > 0.05 for both variables), without significant differences between the PG15 and PG16 groups. In conclusion, a short-term dietary protein supplementationbefore TAI improved OR, prolificacy and fecundity of ewes which were estrous-synchronized by imposing long interval PG (15 or 16 d apart) or P4-eCG-based protocols. There was a greater OR, pro... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
EWE; FERTILITY; FOCUS FEEDING; PROGESTERONE; PROSTAGLANDIN; TIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION. |
Thesagro : |
OVEJAS; REPRODUCCION ANIMAL. |
Asunto categoría : |
L53 Fisiología Animal - Reproducción |
Marc : |
LEADER 02928naa a2200325 a 4500 001 1059854 005 2019-11-04 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.05.011$2DOI 100 1 $aOLIVERA-MUZANTE, J. 245 $aShort-term dietary protein supplementation improves reproductive performance of estrous-synchronized ewes when there are long intervals of prostaglandin or progesterone-based treatments for timed AI.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 500 $aArticle history: Received 21 November 2018 //Received in revised form 9 May 2019// Accepted23May2019//Available online 25 May 2019. 520 $aAbstract:To evaluate the reproductive effects of a short-term dietary protein supplementation (Days -10 to -3) before timed AI (TAI = Day 0), 471 Merino ewes grazing native pastures were estrous-synchronized when there were either long intervals between prostaglandin administrations (two prostaglandin injections 15 or 16 d apart; PG15 and PG16, respectively) or with a progesterone-eCG (P4-eCG) protocol, resulting in a 3 × 2 experimental design. Ovulation rate on Day 8 (OR), non-estrous-return to Day 21 (NRR21), and fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 70 were evaluated. The interaction between estrous synchronization protocol and supplementation was not significant for any of these variables (P > 0.05). Supplementation increased OR, prolificacy and fecundity (+0.14, +0.15 and +0.14, respectively, P < 0.01), but did not affect NRR21 or fertility of ewes (+6.2% and +6.7% respectively, P > 0.05). Ewes treated using the PG15 and PG16 protocols had a lesser OR (-0.27), prolificacy (?0.22) and fecundity (?0.20) than ewes treated using P4-eCG protocol (P < 0.01 for each), and similar NRR21 and fertility (?5.4% and ?7.9% respectively, P > 0.05 for both variables), without significant differences between the PG15 and PG16 groups. In conclusion, a short-term dietary protein supplementationbefore TAI improved OR, prolificacy and fecundity of ewes which were estrous-synchronized by imposing long interval PG (15 or 16 d apart) or P4-eCG-based protocols. There was a greater OR, prolificacy and fecundity when there was use of the P4-eCG compared to longinterval PG-based protocols. Estrous-non-return rate after AI and fertility as a result TAI were not affected by either the supplementation or the estrous synchronization protocols used. 650 $aOVEJAS 650 $aREPRODUCCION ANIMAL 653 $aEWE 653 $aFERTILITY 653 $aFOCUS FEEDING 653 $aPROGESTERONE 653 $aPROSTAGLANDIN 653 $aTIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION 700 1 $aFIERRO, S. 700 1 $aALABART, J.L. 700 1 $aCLARAMUNT, M. 700 1 $aMINTEGUIAGA, M.A. 700 1 $aAUNCHAYNA, G. 700 1 $aERRANDONEA, N. 700 1 $aBANCHERO, G. 773 $tAnimal Reproduction Science, July 2019, Volume 206, Pages 78-84.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|